Earth/Environmental
Science Education
in North Carolina Schools
as presented by
Mary E. Watson, North Carolina Geological Survey
|
|
|
The
following text is excerpted from a presentation delivered by Mary
Watson, of the North Carolina Geological Survey office, at the Coalition
for Earth Science Education (CESE)
annual meeting on January 11th, 2002 at the Goddard Space Flight Center. |
|
|
|
15
Years Ago...Back
to Top
Earth
Science was eliminated from the NC Standard course of Study. A pressure
group was formed to change that. This group is called "Education
and Industry Committee for Earth Science in North Carolina".
This
group is a diverse coalition of scientists from:
- Business
and Industry
- NC Aggregates
Association
- NCGS
- Universities
- public and private
- The NC public
school system & the NC Department of Education
- NOAA
- EPA
- NC state
agencies
- Consultants
|
|
MissionBack
to Top
The
mission of this group was to assure that NC high school students
better understand the importance of earth science and state and
environmental issues. By 1998 a deal was made. Implementation was
deferred until the 1999-2000 school year when earth science was
articulated through grades K-12.
|
|
Students'
ReactionBack
to Top
The
variety of experiences and the importance of environmental awareness
puts students "miles ahead" of where they would have been
just ten years ago:
- "...there
are many days when we do field work on campus."
- "We
go out every day for weather observations."
- We do a
"monthly survey of the beach to track the movement of sand."
|
|
Teachers'
ReactionBack
to Top
- The new
teacher was "a Biology teacher for years and really seems
to be enjoying the experience."
- "Some say they would like to teach only Earth Science."
- "My students have been gathering haze and cloud data for
the CERES project and testing the water quality of a nearby
creek."
|
|
RealismBack
to Top
The
downside is that some of the more experienced teachers feel that
it takes
time away from Advanced Placement courses they value and they don't
want to invest the time in new material.There is an unarticulated
need for teacher preparation and concern about testing. It is estimated
that a test would take three years to develop and a minimum of $150,000
to create.
Our
state presents an interesting dichotomy of being both progressive
and inert.We moved to the front with curriculum reforms. We have
not moved far enough to support the professional development neccessary
to meet needs created by the inovation. We need to look at providing
schools with excellent teaching materials.
|
|
TestingBack
to Top
Pros
- A Good test
can promote reform in science teaching.
Cons
- Teachers
are already overloaded with testing and testing issues. In North
Carolina, the
earth environmental science course is now the only science without
an End of Course test.
|
|
First
Year SnapshotBack
to Top
- Teachers assigned to earth science: 795
- Roughly equal proportion of males and females: 385:410
- Total number of high school teachers: 4,811
- 27% are new teachers (under 30)
- 76% are under 50 (the more vital age group)
- Research indicates that this group is more likely to seek
and benefit from professional development programs.
|
|
Partnerships
= Reform SuccessBack
to Top
- The power
in NC schools rest at the local level
- We try to
show the best ways to accomplish goals, but the choice is theirs.
- Budget constraints
in NC have driven partnership and a creative approach to promotion
- Agencies
will have to play a greater role.
- CESE is
one we want to cultivate, because we believe it is a powerful
ally.
|
|
How
Others See We are Doing.Back
to Top
"A model
of completeness of good organization. Begins in middle school
and conveys a well integrated picture of the historical sciences
in grades 9-12."
Lawrence
S. Lerner in
Good Science, Bad Science: Teaching Evolution
in The States
Thomas B. Fordham Foundation, September 2000
|
|