| 
        
          |  | 2012 UNH GLOBE Training |  
          |  | On Sunday, May 20, 2012, representatives of Elizabeth City  State University, Patrina Bly, and Justin Deloatch, attended workshops held in  conjunction with the NASA Innovations in Climate Education (NICE) program at  the University of New Hampshire in Durham, New Hampshire.   The NICE program is a joint effort between Elizabeth City  State University and the University of New Hampshire geared to empower the  faculty of education programs at Minority  Serving Institutions to better engage their pre-service teachers in teaching  and learning about global climate change through the use of NASA Earth  observation sets. This project is designed to impact teaching first on college  campuses within science education classes.  Second, as pre-service teachers transition  into in-service teachers, the impact will extend to elementary and secondary  schools.  The Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the  Environment (GLOBE) consisted of many hands-on and tactical events that  investigated the carbon cycle in terrestrial ecosystems.  This workshop was gathered the GLOBE  Train-the-Trainer Workshop, and was geared towards having participants learn  the necessary skills needed to train faculty and staff back at their home  institutions.  GLOBE training was a three-day  event lasting May 22 – 24.  Presiders  included Dr. Mary Martin, Sarah Silverburg, and Dr. Lara Gengarelly. GLOBE Train-the-Trainer workshop was a multifaceted  event.  The foundation of the GLOBE  workshop was set up around three main questions.  These questions were termed essential questions  and were comprised of the following: 
              Where is carbon       found and how does it travel though the Earth system?Is there more       carbon stored in the global human population or trees in New Hampshire?How does carbon       storage change within and between ecosystems? In total, eight participants from various backgrounds took  part in the GLOBE Train-the-Trainer workshop.   Tasked with multiple days’ events, participants used numerous methods to  go about answering the posed essential questions.  At the completion of the workshop,  participants self-evaluated their overall comfort in presenting the  information. |  
          |  |  
  
  |  
          |  |  |  |  |